Re: Richardson

From: Rodger Boots <rlboots_at_cedar-rapids.net>
Date: Wed Feb 09 2000 - 15:45:22 EST

Yeah, it would have made sense to go to RCA, IF they wanted hundreds of thousands of tubes. I suspect it was easier to deal with Richardson than RCA. Manufacturers have a
tendency to steer you to an authorized distributor instead of dealing direct. Makes it much easier for them.

Noel Johnson wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 12:11:13 Rodger Boots wrote:
> >For example, when Wells-Gardner decided to make their vector monitor, they got the
> >TUBES from Richardson.
>
> Wouldn't it have made more sense for WG to have bought directly from RCA, the original manufacturer of the tube? After all they built 10's of thousands of those monitors. ;-)
>
> I suspect they steer people to Richardson now because they are aware that Richardson sells hard to find tubes.
>
> Noel
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
> ** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
> ** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.

--
Windows:
32 bit graphical interface for a
16 bit patch for an
8 bit operating system written for a
4 bit processor by a
2 bit company that can't stand
1 bit of competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.
Received on Wed Feb 9 15:58:00 2000

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:30:58 EDT