Re: VECTOR:Star Castle Display board variations??

From: Zonn <zonn_at_zonn.com>
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 13:34:07 EST

On Wed, 06 Mar 2002 01:15:55 -0600, Rodger Boots <rlboots@cedar-rapids.net>
wrote:

>MKDUD@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 3/5/2002 10:32:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, MKDUD@aol.com
>> writes:
>>
>> << <A HREF="http://www.members.aol.com/mkdud/cinemon/levelint.jpg">
>> http://www.members.aol.com/mkdud/cinemon/levelint.jpg</A> >>
>>
>> Sorry! This above URL is the correct one for the pic of the Cinemat boards
>> from my previous post. I was reading Mark's G08 faq (great job, BTW!) and
>> left his URL in the hyperlink by mistake.

That's the 64 level Solar Quest intensity board. That's probably not going to
work very well with a Star Castle CPU.

---
There's no problem using the WG transistors in place of the originals. They're
better transistors with similar specs.
 
>> While I'm on the Cinematronics monitors, has anyone ever set up inline fuses
>> to the deflection transistors (I was thinking 2.5amp SB) to protect the
>> display board components should the deflection transistors go?
>
>
>Careful there.  If you add fuses they should be in series with the
>yoke.  Anything that partially disconnects the output transistors from
>the drivers will cause driver damage (like unplugging the output
>transistors).
What Rodger said.
-Zonn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.
Received on Wed Mar 6 10:35:40 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:33:55 EDT