Re: 2N3716 vs. 2N3716X

From: Jeffrey Matthews <spender1111_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon Sep 30 2013 - 22:31:13 EDT
John;
I do not want to take a chance and try to work SMD's, I'm too old to see that small... ;-) , I'll just rebuild the LV section, My Way (read - Overkill!).

If you check out the input PCB, I do believe that is the protection you are speaking of. It is in the manual on a separate sheet, not on the main schems and plugs into the deflection PCB.

Jeff


On 9/30/2013 8:19 PM, John Robertson wrote:
Well, I was just looking at the 6400 schematics that I have and it certainly looks like the LV2000 could work for it too with modifications for R3 and R4 to bring it up to the required 47V (adjustable range +/- 10V?) regulated voltages. The LM317 can't handle more than 37V difference between input/output so someone would have to do the calculations. Back diodes on the capacitors and 317 would help protect it during powerdown.

Of course now the LV2000 is all surface mount, not like the old kits so might be a bit harder. Or do they still sell kits?

The original question was about using the "X" version of the transistors, certainly on the higher voltage 6400 one does need to match better, and probably add a clamp circuit to the inputs similar to used on some of the GO8s to prevent overswing inputs...

John :-#)#

On 09/30/2013 4:40 PM, David Shoemaker wrote:
Your also off by 300 on the monitor.

The lv2000 is for the 6100 the original question was about the uber rare 6400 which I don't think has a LV upgrade available.

David  :-)=

From: John Robertson
Sent: ‎9/‎30/‎2013 3:54 PM
To: vectorlist@vectorlist.org
Subject: Re: VECTOR: 2N3716 vs. 2N3716X

LV2000 - only off by 1000, hardly a big difference! (ducking)

http://www.vector-repair.com/

Interesting, there is now an LV2000 -Light.

John ;-#)#

On 09/30/2013 12:17 PM, David Shoemaker wrote:
Is there a lv1000 for the 6400?


David  :-)=

From: John Robertson
Sent: ‎9/‎30/‎2013 10:45 AM
To: vectorlist@vectorlist.org
Subject: Re: VECTOR: 2N3716 vs. 2N3716X

On 09/29/2013 5:40 AM, Jeffrey Matthews wrote:
> Hi;
> I searched the usual forums (and Google) but did not find much
> information regarding a 2N3716 vs. 2N3716X transistor as used in the
> WG6400 application. I found a spec sheet (after some searching) for a
> 2N3716X and the only difference that I can find, (it is an abridged
> spec sheet - not complete) is that the 2N3716 has a hfe 0f 4.0 to
> ----, (no end number given) and the "X" has a hfe of 50 to 200.
> Is it safe to assume the "standard" transistor will work in place of
> the "X" version?
> Does anyone have full spec sheets for the 2N3716X and the 2N3792X
> transistors?
> Thanks in advance.
> Jeff

"X" was the extended range (special selection). I see no need for it if
you have the LV1000 kit installed...

John :-#)#

--
John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9
Call (604)872-5757 or Fax 872-2010 (Pinballs, Jukes, VideoGames)
                  www.flippers.com
"Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org
** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com


-- 
John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9 
Call (604)872-5757 or Fax 872-2010 (Pinballs, Jukes, VideoGames)
                 www.flippers.com 
"Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"


-- 
John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9 
Call (604)872-5757 or Fax 872-2010 (Pinballs, Jukes, VideoGames)
                 www.flippers.com 
"Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org ** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com Received on Mon Sep 30 22:30:12 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 30 2013 - 22:50:01 EDT