On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:38:59 -0600, you wrote:
>> So where, what part #, cost, etc. are good replacements for these
>> interconnects?  I haven't looked in a while, but are all the connectors the
>> same size?  If I recall, I thought the interconnects on a Journey boardset
>> (another MCR) had some different sizes (I could easily be wrong on that).
        On an MCR-II stack, all of them are 24-pin single-row connectors.
MCR-III may be different, but I wouldn't know for sure as I don't own any
MCR-III games.
>I found a cable company out in California (if I had looked hard enough I 
>could have found one locally I suppose) that made up a couple sets of 
>cables for me. Just regular IDE flat cables & connectors. You could make 
>them yourself if you have the crimping tool.
        You must use _SCSI_ cables, not IDE!  An IDE cable is only 40 pins,
arranged in 2 rows of 20 -- that's not enough pins in a row to substitute
for the 24-pin MCR connectors.  SCSI cables are 50-pin, arranged as 2x25.
        I wouldn't even bother with having them made; just go find a couple of
seven-device SCSI cables at your local Fry's Electronics, CompUSA, or other
computer-hardware store and just cut them up as follows:
 _                _      _      _      _      _      _      _
| |______________|D|_C _|D|____|D|_C _|D|____|D|_C _|D|____|D|
| |              |E| U  |E|    |E| U  |E|    |E| U  |E|    |E|
|H|              |V| T  |V|    |V| T  |V|    |V| T  |V|    |V|
|O|              |I|    |I|    |I|    |I|    |I|    |I|    |I|
|S|              |C|    |C|    |C|    |C|    |C|    |C|    |C|
|T|              |E|  H |E|    |E|  H |E|    |E|  H |E|    |E|
| |              | |  E | |    | |  E | |    | |  E | |    | |
| |______________|1|_ R_|2|____|3|_ R_|4|____|5|_ R_|6|____|7|
|_|              |_|  E |_|    |_|  E |_|    |_|  E |_|    |_|
        Just trim the ribbon cables off close to the body of the connectors,
and voila -- three suitable MCR interconnects per SCSI cable. :)  
        (Well, four, technically, but usually the cable length between the
"host" and "device 1" connectors is quite a bit longer, and knowing how
fussy those boards can be to start with I prefer not to tempt fate by
having one cable longer than the others.  Yeah, I know it _shouldn't_ make
any difference at the (relatively) short distances and low clock speeds
we're dealing with here, but why invite trouble? :)  Especially since you
still need two more cabiles and will need to cut up a second SCSI cable
anyway.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A: Because it reverses the natural flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
solarfox@DON'TMESSWITHtexas.net                              (Gary Akins jr.)
http://lonestar.texas.net/~solarfox
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org
** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com
Received on Fri Mar  4 11:10:23 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 06 2005 - 01:50:01 EST