Re: Tempest on top as we go into the new millennium

On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Tek wrote:

> Speaking of S/N ratio and Clay, I really think it is a SHAME that a vector guru
> like Clay decided to leave because he was beaten on for offering a very nice
> deal we all could profit from.
>
> I really think the CRT-charge thread (which WAS interesting, however), has done
> more bad to the S/N than this one message of Clay. CRT-charges are not more
> Vector related than soldering stations I think... but hey are both applicable
> and thus more or less appropriate.
>
> I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but I really disapprove with this
> happening, and especially when reading a prelude to this group it comes to
> mind...

Guys,

        Let's please keep our personal opinions of vectorlist policy in
private email to the list owners (either me or labuda@dell.com.) It's not
on topic, and, worse yet, it makes us look bad. If you have some problem
with list policy, PLEASE let us know in email, NOT on the list.

        I have no control over who subscribes or unsubscribes. Clay
unsubscribed of his own free will (no one drove him out, as is being
insinuated,) presumably in response to something someone else said to him
about his desoldering stations. While I was sad to see him go (as I would
be for anyone who unsubscribed,) what can anyone do? It was his
decision. I think it is a SHAME that some people can't grow up and move
on. If you have a problem with it, bug Clay, NOT the list. The only
person responsible for Clay's unsubscribing from the list was Clay and
Clay alone.

        If you have some problem with this message, PLEASE let me know in
private email, to be considerate to others on the list.

Thanks,

Joe
Received on Wed Jan 5 11:40:05 2000