Could not have put it better...
"Mark A. Jenison" wrote:
> So "Pull" commerce seems appropriate; who best to refer to about vector
> parts than a bunch of vector groupies? However, I understand where you
> guys are coming from: You don't want the list to become "Al's Bargain
> Bin". Yet I think just about all vector resource can be considered
> "uncommon" at this point and time, and thus these available parts should
> be considered another valuable resource on the vector list.
Received on Tue Jan 11 16:29:28 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:31:18 EDT