>I was looking at the 290 which is pretty much the same camera
>(hardware-wise)
>but with much better scripting abilities (it supports built in time lapse
[...]
>All in all though, the 280 is a nice camera! (And I thought is *was* the
>one
>MAME ran in, I don't think the 290 was out when they announced the MAME
>thing.)
Yeah, I was thinking DC290 for the above listed features as well, but the
DC280 was $528 at ecost.com, and the DC290 was $899? Being that the most
expensive camera I ever bought before was made of cardboard and came with
film in it I just couldn't bring myself to spend $900... ;-)
I really wanted something for doing documentation (macro mode,
lots-o-pixels) for Multigames, and the Kodak's seem to have really good
picture quality.
-Clay
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.
Received on Tue Mar 21 14:23:19 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:31:58 EDT