Re: separate vector list?

"Magiera, Joe (AIT)" wrote:

> > Does anyone think that VAPS is big enough that we could split
> > it into two organizations with one focusing on vector games???
>
> No, no, definitely not. After enduring the pains of the RGVAC/RGVAM split,
> how could you suggest another split? I'm already hurting at wanting to ask
> technical questions to the talented audience here (many don't even read
> RGVAC anymore), but I don't because they're for rastor games. No more
> splits please!

Don't forget how E-bay changed the market of games/parts in RGVAC also.

The signal to noise ratio of Sales that still proliferate in RGVAC turn many
off as does the increased juvenile post (29 of 59 post in RGVAC in my que are
FS/FA or related).

Size of the community, as more contribute & more post are available it becomes
harder to follow (hence Vectorlists).

> VAPS is fine the
> way it is, and the vectorlist is fine the way it is too. Don't mess with
> success. Now if we could just find a way to get all the entires into KLOV
> and get everyone to join VAPS...

KLOV I understand but what is the point of VAPS? (Keep in mind I don't even
own a working Pac-Man machine.)

--
Kev                    Mowerman@erols.com    >>REMOVE THE ? to REPLY
Looking for Pac-Man related hacks & Video Game
Coin Op Page ->  http://www.erols.com/mowerman