Re: various vector...

I'd have to agree with Clay on this. Although jeez, both sides are extremely
valid. Clay, who, as far as I am concerned, does not spam the list; and the
need for rules to PREVENT such spam in the case of an individual that does.
Hell I don't know what to do, but I do know that it makes little sense to force
such an important contributor OFF of the list by enforcing such a rule in this
manner.

I suggest this; we have a moderator. So let's use him. Keep the rule; when the
moderator determines it's being broken; poll the list for confirmation. When
(and if) we agree (democratically; largest response percentage wins), the man is
dropped from the list.

If the moderator is to feel he has any importance at all moderating, he may
disagree with this. I can understand that. Perhaps a new list IS required.

Ace
(ducking...)
Ni-Wumpf Ltd.

Clay Cowgill wrote:

> >On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Clay Cowgill wrote:
> >
> > > 5) Anyone need to buy a working/complete Star Wars boardset? I have
> > > several at $150/ea. (I need the space for "prooduction" more than extra
> > > Star Wars boardsets...)
> > >
> >
> > Chalk this up to a really bad day (see my post on RGVAC,) but
> >I need to comment on this. There should be NO commerce on
> >vectorlist.
>
> I'm afraid I just can't get along with this rule. There's too many
> exceptions. "Push" commerce isn't allowed except for reproductions and
> whatnot... What the hell? It's still selling something. Presumably the
> seller still makes money-- presumably the product is available in even
> *greater* quantities than original parts. Selling a reproduction control
> panel is OK, but selling an original isn't? Huh? "Pull" commerce is OK
> too? ('I need a such-and-such')
Received on Tue Jan 11 16:40:22 2000